December 03 2008 Conference Call - Revision history

Anhkhanhnd: /* Next Meeting */

2011-08-07T13:23:36Z

Next Meeting

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:23, 7 August 2011
Line 122:		Line 122:
	==Next Meeting==		==Next Meeting==
	*[[December 17 2008 Conference Call]]		*[[December 17 2008 Conference Call]]
			[http://www.dangcapseo.com/seo/category/dich-vu-seo Dịch vụ seo]

2011-06-24T03:59:18Z

Marketing group output

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:59, 24 June 2011
Line 79:		Line 79:

	Alan Mitchell asked to join the effort.		Alan Mitchell asked to join the effort.
			[http://www.vietnamseo.org Marketing online]
			[http://www.aboutvietnam.org Vietnam guide]
			[http://www.quangbaweb.biz Quang ba web]
			[http://www.vietnamandroid.com Android]

	===Organization and IP policy discussion===		===Organization and IP policy discussion===

2008-12-05T03:27:35Z

Conflicts

2008-12-03T18:35:32Z

Conflicts

2008-12-03T18:32:11Z

Next face to face

@@ Line 95: / Line 95: @@
 ===Next face to face===
 ===Expectations===
 ===VPI===

2008-12-03T18:23:53Z

Organization and IP policy discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 3 December 2008
Line 88:		Line 88:

	Got to get the principles up. Website up. FAQ. These are gatekeepers for getting funding into VRM.		Got to get the principles up. Website up. FAQ. These are gatekeepers for getting funding into VRM.

			Iain notes that all of the either relationship stages in his recent email, have hundreds of pages.
			Joe notes that with SwitchBook's NSF funding, he is ready to convene public discussions to create a search map specification.

			Let's set up a weekly 1 hour meeting.

	===Next face to face===		===Next face to face===

2008-12-03T18:19:39Z

Marketing group output

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:19, 3 December 2008
Line 77:		Line 77:

	Is this marketing group for marketing VRM or is it for the implications /for/ marketing of VRM. Answer: it is for marketing VRM. We are looking at interpreting VRM for "the real world". To be able to take what we do and take it to large retailers and invite them to be part of a pilot project, with a nice fee to fund that. So, anything we write has to make it past legal and IT as well as marketing. We want them to understand there is benefit here and in their language. We have a few candidate firms to approach.		Is this marketing group for marketing VRM or is it for the implications /for/ marketing of VRM. Answer: it is for marketing VRM. We are looking at interpreting VRM for "the real world". To be able to take what we do and take it to large retailers and invite them to be part of a pilot project, with a nice fee to fund that. So, anything we write has to make it past legal and IT as well as marketing. We want them to understand there is benefit here and in their language. We have a few candidate firms to approach.

			Alan Mitchell asked to join the effort.

	===Organization and IP policy discussion===		===Organization and IP policy discussion===

2008-12-03T18:18:29Z

Marketing group output

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 3 December 2008
Line 74:		Line 74:

	===Marketing group output===		===Marketing group output===
			Group started out with Sean & Chris document, plus help with Dean and Deb. Sean has been picking up stuff and working on two new documents. Talking with some designers, looking for pro-bono.

			Is this marketing group for marketing VRM or is it for the implications /for/ marketing of VRM. Answer: it is for marketing VRM. We are looking at interpreting VRM for "the real world". To be able to take what we do and take it to large retailers and invite them to be part of a pilot project, with a nice fee to fund that. So, anything we write has to make it past legal and IT as well as marketing. We want them to understand there is benefit here and in their language. We have a few candidate firms to approach.

	===Organization and IP policy discussion===		===Organization and IP policy discussion===
	There are some challenges playing well with Berkman. Doc needs to build up the project at Berkman, ie, getting funding in, before growing the project outside Berkman.		There are some challenges playing well with Berkman. Doc needs to build up the project at Berkman, ie, getting funding in, before growing the project outside Berkman.

2008-12-03T18:15:05Z

Organization and IP policy discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:15, 3 December 2008
Line 75:		Line 75:
	===Marketing group output===		===Marketing group output===
	===Organization and IP policy discussion===		===Organization and IP policy discussion===
			There are some challenges playing well with Berkman. Doc needs to build up the project at Berkman, ie, getting funding in, before growing the project outside Berkman.

			Conversation processing Bill Smith's feedback.

			Doc is meeting with a lawyer next week on the organizational side.

			Got to get the principles up. Website up. FAQ. These are gatekeepers for getting funding into VRM.

	===Next face to face===		===Next face to face===
	===Expectations===		===Expectations===

2008-12-03T18:12:15Z

CRM Business

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:12, 3 December 2008
Line 67:		Line 67:

	Once we have the declaration of independence and constitution, we can use that to focus our attention and to counter the inevitable efforts to co-opt VRM.		Once we have the declaration of independence and constitution, we can use that to focus our attention and to counter the inevitable efforts to co-opt VRM.

			Actions:
			#In the principles, we need to specifically address the reciprocity between CRM and VRM, that these are additive relationships.
			#Doc would like to work with Iain on an article/working set of talking points about what VRM means for CRM.
			#An event--VRM + CRM. Preferably one of many verticals. Doc would like to feel we are a bit further downstream. More concrete stuff to talk about.

	===Marketing group output===		===Marketing group output===