<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/projectvrm/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=YnlMtj</id>
	<title>Project VRM - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/projectvrm/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=YnlMtj"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/projectvrm/Special:Contributions/YnlMtj"/>
	<updated>2026-10-02T12:04:04Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cyber.harvard.edu/projectvrm/?title=Challenges_and_use_cases&amp;diff=1889</id>
		<title>Challenges and use cases</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cyber.harvard.edu/projectvrm/?title=Challenges_and_use_cases&amp;diff=1889"/>
		<updated>2007-04-11T06:26:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;YnlMtj: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== VRM meets DRM ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps VRM should stand for Vendor Rights Management as well as Vendor Relationship Management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps rights management and relationship management should be the same thing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps companies doing DRM wouldn&#039;t have to bear the full responsibility for managing the rights involved in relationships. Things could be done by mutual agreement by both sides.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We need to make &amp;quot;rights management&amp;quot; something that is mutual in operation, and mutually beneficial. How should we approach that?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Setting terms of service ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/credit/2006-12-15-card-fees-usat_x.htm Credit card fees can suck you in&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>YnlMtj</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>