https://cyber.harvard.edu/projectvrm/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=LucasC 2026-09-29T00:37:27Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.43.6 https://cyber.harvard.edu/projectvrm/?title=VRM_CRM_2010_Sessions_Wiki&diff=4476 2010-09-02T03:50:56Z

<p>LucasC: </p> <hr /> <div>Unconference breakout sessions for Day 1<br /> <br /> Unconference breakout sessions for Day 2<br /> <br /> '''Notes for the Government Relationship Management (GRM) Session'''<br /> *Q: How do we create citizen ownership of the governance process?<br /> *Q: What is the tragedy of the Netroots?<br /> *Q: How do we get citizens and politicians to engage in a deeper way?<br /> *Q: What could help to make citizen engagement deeper, resilient, and sustainable?<br /> **conversations that lead to smarter policy, minimizing the effect of sound bites and 30-sec TV ads<br /> **positive feedback loops that keep citizens coming back<br /> **clear ways to channel emotion into a solution<br /> **widespread harnessing of tools like SeeClickFix-- geolocation through mobile platforms so citizens can point out deficiencies at a particular location and notify government of problems<br /> **confidence that commenting on a social network can result in action or notification to the appropriate government agency<br /> **easy ways to walk up a ladder of engagement of deeper and more meaningful public participation<br /> **tips/training wheels on how to be more effective as an engaged citizen<br /> **game-like user experiences to make citizenship more engaging (works for some citizens)<br /> **a possible Mechanical Turk for government where a government agency can ask a large number of citizens to take a particular action. Perhaps this can also be bidirectional where citizens can initiate a request for several government agencies to collaborate on a solving a problem that was identified by citizens and around which large numbers of citizens rallied.<br /> <br /> '''Conversation Experiment'''<br /> <br /> You're welcome to join this [http://onlinetownhalls.com/map/429 experimental conversation] on 27 questions remaining after the conference (not for use in Internet Explorer). The software enables many trains of thought to be mapped out at once. We are seeing if this is a tool that is useful for diving deeper than standard email discussion lists can provide. This experiment is run by Lucas Cioffi of AthenaBridge.</div>

LucasC https://cyber.harvard.edu/projectvrm/?title=VRM_CRM_2010_Sessions_Wiki&diff=4474 2010-08-27T21:23:10Z

<p>LucasC: </p> <hr /> <div>Unconference breakout sessions for Day 1<br /> <br /> Unconference breakout sessions for Day 2<br /> <br /> '''Notes for the Government Relationship Management (GRM) Session'''<br /> *Q: How do we create citizen ownership of the governance process?<br /> *Q: What is the tragedy of the Netroots?<br /> *Q: How do we get citizens and politicians to engage in a deeper way?<br /> *Q: What could help to bring about deeper citizen engagement resilient and sustainable?<br /> **conversations that lead to smarter policy, minimizing the effect of sound bites and 30-sec TV ads<br /> **positive feedback loops that keep citizens coming back<br /> **clear ways to channel emotion into a solution<br /> **widespread harnessing of tools like SeeClickFix-- geolocation through mobile platforms so citizens can point out deficiencies at a particular location and notify government of problems<br /> **confidence that commenting on a social network can result in action or notification to the appropriate government agency<br /> **easy ways to walk up a ladder of engagement of deeper and more meaningful public participation<br /> **tips/training wheels on how to be more effective as an engaged citizen<br /> **game-like user experiences to make citizenship more engaging (works for some citizens)<br /> **a possible Mechanical Turk for government where a government agency can ask a large number of citizens to take a particular action. Perhaps this can also be bidirectional where citizens can initiate a request for several government agencies to collaborate on a solving a problem that was identified by citizens and around which large numbers of citizens rallied.<br /> <br /> '''Conversation Experiment'''<br /> <br /> You're welcome to join this [http://onlinetownhalls.com/map/429 experimental conversation] on 27 questions remaining after the conference (not for use in Internet Explorer). The software enables many trains of thought to be mapped out at once. We are seeing if this is a tool that is useful for diving deeper than standard email discussion lists can provide. This experiment is run by Lucas Cioffi of AthenaBridge.</div>

LucasC https://cyber.harvard.edu/projectvrm/?title=VRM_CRM_2010_Sessions_Wiki&diff=4473 2010-08-27T20:15:25Z

<p>LucasC: </p> <hr /> <div>Unconference breakout sessions for Day 1<br /> <br /> Unconference breakout sessions for Day 2<br /> <br /> '''Notes for the Government Relationship Management (GRM) Session'''<br /> *Q: How do we create citizen ownership of the governance process?<br /> *Q: What is the tragedy of the Netroots?<br /> *Q: How do we get citizens and politicians to engage in a deeper way?<br /> *Q: What could help to bring about deeper citizen engagement resilient and sustainable?<br /> **conversations that lead to smarter policy, minimizing the effect of sound bites and 30-sec TV ads<br /> **positive feedback loops that keep citizens coming back<br /> **clear ways to channel emotion into a solution<br /> **widespread harnessing of tools like SeeClickFix-- geolocation through mobile platforms so citizens can point out deficiencies at a particular location and notify government of problems<br /> **confidence that commenting on a social network can result in action or notification to the appropriate government agency<br /> **easy ways to walk up a ladder of engagement of deeper and more meaningful public participation<br /> **tips/training wheels on how to be more effective as an engaged citizen<br /> **game-like user experiences to make citizenship more engaging (works for some citizens)<br /> **a possible Mechanical Turk for government where a government agency can ask a large number of citizens to take a particular action. Perhaps this can also be bidirectional where citizens can initiate a request for several government agencies to collaborate on a solving a problem that was identified by citizens and around which large numbers of citizens rallied.</div>

LucasC